Curr Health Sci J, vol. 40, no. 3, 2014
Paradoxical Growth of Optochiasmatic Tuberculoma during the Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis
[Case Reports]
I. AHMETGJEKAJ(1), S. KABASHI-MUQAJ(1), L. CORINA LASCU(2), S. BONDARI(2), A. BONDARI(2)
(1)Clinic of Radiology, UCCK, Prishtina, Kosova, Faculty of Medicine, Pristine University, Imaging Center Prima, Pristine, Kosova;
(2)University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
Abstract:
Intracranial brain parenchymal tuberculomas may form paradoxically, days to months after starting antituberculous drug therapy. They may develop in and around optic chiasm and optic nerves after antituberculous treatment as a quite rare occurrence in tuberculous meningitis (TBM) this may lead to severe visual loss if not treated properly. We describe a 5 year-old child with documented TBM being treated with first line antituberculous drugs which developed visual impairment 3 months after starting the treatment. MRI after gadolinium administration revealed multiple perichiasmatic ring enhancing lesions due to tuberculomas. Visual impairment developing in a patient on treatment with antituberculous drugs should give rise to a suspicion of rare optochiasmatic tuberculomas; this necessitates urgent contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain and prompt treatment with steroids.
Keywords: optochiasmatic tuberculoma, paradoxical response, MRI
Corresponding: Ilir Ahmetgjekaj, MD, Department of Radiology, UCCK, Prishtine, Kosova, President of the Radiolgist Asotiation of Kosova; e-mail: drilir@hotmail.com
DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.40.03.14 - Download PDF Paradoxical Growth of Optochiasmatic Tuberculoma during the Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis PDF
Download coverDownload contents
Journal archive
- vol. 51 no. 4, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 3, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 2, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 1, 2025
- vol. 50 no. 4, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 3, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 2, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 1, 2024
- vol. 49 no. 4, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 3, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 2, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 1, 2023
- vol. 48 no. 4, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 3, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 2, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 1, 2022
- vol. 47 no. 4, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 3, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 2, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 1, 2021
- vol. 46 no. 4, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 3, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 2, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 1, 2020
- vol. 45 no. 4, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 3, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 2, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 1, 2019
- vol. 44 no. 4, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 3, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 2, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 1, 2018
- vol. 43 no. 4, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 3, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 2, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 1, 2017
- vol. 42 no. 4, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 3, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 2, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 1, 2016
- vol. 41 no. 4, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 3, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 2, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 1, 2015
- vol. 40 no. 4, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 3, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 2, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 1, 2014
- vol. 39 no. 4, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 3, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 2, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 1, 2013
- vol. 38 no. 4, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 3, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 2, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 1, 2012
- vol. 37 no. 4, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 3, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 2, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 1, 2011
- vol. 36 no. 4, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 3, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 2, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 1, 2010
- vol. 35 no. 4, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 3, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 2, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 1, 2009
