CHSJ

Curr Health Sci J, vol. 51, no. 2, 2025

Statin Use in Cervical Artery Dissection and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke

[Original Paper]

O.U.H. LODHI(1), S. YAGHI(2), L. SHU(2), N. CHUNG(2), C.R. LEON GUERRERO(3), J.E. KAUFMAN(4), S. ENGELTER(4), C. TRAENKA(4), W. KAM(5), A.S. ZUBAIR(6), M. ALMAJALI(7), J.P. MARTO(8), M. AFFAN(1)


(1)Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA;
(2)Department of Neurology, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA;
(3)Department of Neurology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA;
(4)Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER-Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland;
(5)Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina Health Rex, Raleigh, NC, USA;
(6)Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA;
(7)Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;
(8)Department of Neurology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal


Abstract:

Background and purpose: The role of statins in preventing recurrent ischemic strokes in the setting of non-traumatic cervical artery dissection remains unclear. This study, a secondary analysis of Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection (STOP-CAD) study, investigates the impact of statin therapy on subsequent ischemic stroke. Methods: STOP-CAD, a multicenter retrospective observational study, included 4023 patients with non-major trauma-related CAD. For this sub study, we included 2610 patients with ischemic stroke, excluding those with non-ischemic presentations and missing statin information. Patients were stratified based on statin use at hospital discharge and a sensitivity analysis was conducted based on intensity: high-intensity, moderate-intensity, low-intensity, or no statin. Primary outcome was the incidence of subsequent ischemic stroke after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included major hemorrhage, mortality and 90-day functional outcomes. Statistical analyses included univariate analyses, Cox regression models to evaluate odds and hazard ratios. Results: There was no significant difference in subsequent ischemic strokes after hospital discharge between the statin group (3.1%) and no statin group (3.3%) (aHR 0.73 95% CI, 0.43-1.24, p=0.25). Similarly, the incidence of major hemorrhage, mortality and 90-day functional outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Statin therapy did not significantly reduce the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke, major hemorrhage, functional outcome, or mortality. While statins are beneficial in reducing vascular events and improving outcomes in ischemic stroke, its benefits in CAD-related ischemic strokes are less clear. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies and further research to optimize secondary prevention in CAD-related stroke.


Keywords: Cervical artery dissection, acute stroke; statin.



Corresponding: Omair ul haq Lodhi, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware ST SE MMC 295, Minneapolis, MN 55455, US, e-mail: lodhi.omair@gmail.com


DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.10 - Download PDF
current issue cover Download cover
Download contents

Journal archive