Curr Health Sci J, vol. 51, no. 2, 2025
Esophageal Stenting Using Laparogastroscopy Compared With Esophageal Endoscopic Stenting: Retrospective Analysis
[Original Paper]
N. HASSAN(1), S. DAN(2), V. DAN(4), N. CRISTINA(3)
(1)Department of surgical oncology, Medlife-Polisano Hospital of Sibiu;
(2)Department of general surgery, County Hospital of Sibiu;
(3)Department of Haematology, Medlife Polisano Hospital of Sibiu;
(4)University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu” Cluj-Napoca
Abstract:
Esophageal stenosis is a debilitating condition that impairs swallowing and markedly reduces quality of life. Its etiology is multifactorial, including gastroesophageal reflux, radiation, caustic and surgical injuries, benign and malignant tumors. Endoscopic stenting represents a modern, minimally invasive treatment, yet some cases remain refractory to such approaches. Surgical options in benign strictures are limited, often leading to feeding enterostomies that compromise patient outcomes. Laparo-gastroscopic esophageal endoprosthesis, introduced in 1997, bridges endoscopy and surgery, reducing morbidity. This hybrid technique offers a reliable alternative for patients unfit for conventional surgical repair. Our study evaluates its role compared to standard endoscopic stenting, focusing on patient selection, outcomes, and dysphagia improvement.
Keywords: Endoscopic stenting, esophageal stenosis, esophageal stenting, laparogastroscopic stenting.
Corresponding: Noor Hassan, Department of surgical oncology, Medlife-Polisano Hospital of Sibiu, e-mail: nmfhassan@gmail.com
DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.51.02.05 - Download PDF Esophageal Stenting Using Laparogastroscopy Compared With Esophageal Endoscopic Stenting: Retrospective Analysis PDF
Download coverDownload contents
Journal archive
- vol. 51 no. 4, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 3, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 2, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 1, 2025
- vol. 50 no. 4, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 3, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 2, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 1, 2024
- vol. 49 no. 4, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 3, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 2, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 1, 2023
- vol. 48 no. 4, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 3, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 2, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 1, 2022
- vol. 47 no. 4, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 3, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 2, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 1, 2021
- vol. 46 no. 4, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 3, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 2, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 1, 2020
- vol. 45 no. 4, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 3, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 2, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 1, 2019
- vol. 44 no. 4, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 3, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 2, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 1, 2018
- vol. 43 no. 4, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 3, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 2, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 1, 2017
- vol. 42 no. 4, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 3, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 2, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 1, 2016
- vol. 41 no. 4, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 3, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 2, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 1, 2015
- vol. 40 no. 4, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 3, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 2, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 1, 2014
- vol. 39 no. 4, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 3, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 2, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 1, 2013
- vol. 38 no. 4, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 3, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 2, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 1, 2012
- vol. 37 no. 4, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 3, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 2, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 1, 2011
- vol. 36 no. 4, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 3, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 2, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 1, 2010
- vol. 35 no. 4, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 3, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 2, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 1, 2009
