Curr Health Sci J, vol. 51, no. 3, 2025
Inflammatory Markers in Pediatric Bacterial Sepsis vs. SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Study
[Original Paper]
A. ANDRUSCA(1), C.M. MIHAI(1), C.A. PANTAZI(1), S.C. CAMBREA(2), I. ION(1), E. ANTON(3), T. CHISNOIU(1), A. LUPU(3), R.M. STOICESCU(4), F.D. ENACHE(5), V.V. LUPU(3), I. ION(1)
(1)Pediatrics, Faculty of General Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania;
(2)Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania;
(3)Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania;
(4)Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Ovidius" University of Constanta, Romania;
(5)Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania
Abstract:
Early differentiation between bacterial sepsis and viral infection in pediatric patients is critical for timely and appropriate therapy. We compared the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and D-dimer in children with bacterial sepsis and those with SARS-CoV-2 infection to discern characteristic profiles. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 97 pediatric sepsis cases (culture-confirmed bacterial infections) and 100 pediatric COVID-19 cases (RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2). The initial inflammatory marker levels were extracted from the medical records. Statistical comparisons of means and medians were performed, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: CRP levels were markedly higher in bacterial sepsis (mean 8.1mg/dL, median 7.4mg/dL) than in COVID-19 (mean 4.1mg/dL, median 3.35mg/dL; p<0.001). ESR was also elevated in sepsis (mean 46mm/h) versus COVID-19 (mean 26mm/h; p<0.001). Fibrinogen showed the opposite pattern, being significantly lower in sepsis (mean 304.7mg/dL, median 267mg/dL) than in COVID-19 (mean 421mg/dL, median 448mg/dL; p<0.001). D-dimer was high in both groups; the COVID-19 cohort had a higher mean D-dimer (3.2?g/mL) with considerable variability, whereas the sepsis cohort’s D-dimer was slightly lower and more homogeneous (difference not statistically significant). Conclusions: Pediatric bacterial infection and COVID-19 exhibit distinct inflammatory marker profiles. Sepsis induces a more intense CRP and ESR response, whereas COVID-19 is characterized by markedly elevated fibrinogen and variable D-dimer levels.
Keywords: Inflammatory markers, sepsis, COVID-19, pediatric.
Corresponding: Tatiana Chisnoiu, Pediatrics, Faculty of General Medicine, "Ovidius" University of Constanta, Constanta, Romania, e-mail: tatiana_ceafcu@yahoo.com
DOI 10.12865/CHSJ.51.03.11 - Download PDF Inflammatory Markers in Pediatric Bacterial Sepsis vs. SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Study PDF
Download coverDownload contents
Journal archive
- vol. 51 no. 4, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 3, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 2, 2025
- vol. 51 no. 1, 2025
- vol. 50 no. 4, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 3, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 2, 2024
- vol. 50 no. 1, 2024
- vol. 49 no. 4, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 3, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 2, 2023
- vol. 49 no. 1, 2023
- vol. 48 no. 4, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 3, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 2, 2022
- vol. 48 no. 1, 2022
- vol. 47 no. 4, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 3, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 2, 2021
- vol. 47 no. 1, 2021
- vol. 46 no. 4, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 3, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 2, 2020
- vol. 46 no. 1, 2020
- vol. 45 no. 4, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 3, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 2, 2019
- vol. 45 no. 1, 2019
- vol. 44 no. 4, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 3, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 2, 2018
- vol. 44 no. 1, 2018
- vol. 43 no. 4, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 3, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 2, 2017
- vol. 43 no. 1, 2017
- vol. 42 no. 4, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 3, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 2, 2016
- vol. 42 no. 1, 2016
- vol. 41 no. 4, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 3, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 2, 2015
- vol. 41 no. 1, 2015
- vol. 40 no. 4, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 3, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 2, 2014
- vol. 40 no. 1, 2014
- vol. 39 no. 4, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 3, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 2, 2013
- vol. 39 no. 1, 2013
- vol. 38 no. 4, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 3, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 2, 2012
- vol. 38 no. 1, 2012
- vol. 37 no. 4, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 3, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 2, 2011
- vol. 37 no. 1, 2011
- vol. 36 no. 4, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 3, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 2, 2010
- vol. 36 no. 1, 2010
- vol. 35 no. 4, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 3, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 2, 2009
- vol. 35 no. 1, 2009
